BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//ChamberMaster//Event Calendar 2.0//EN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:P1H
REFRESH-INTERVAL:P1H
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:America/New_York
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=3;BYDAY=2SU
DTSTART:20070101T000000
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
TZNAME:Eastern Daylight Time
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=11;BYDAY=1SU
DTSTART:20070101T000000
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
TZNAME:Eastern Standard Time
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20260716T123000
DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20260716T133000
X-MICROSOFT-CDO-ALLDAYEVENT:FALSE
SUMMARY:Total Rewards Network Meetup
DESCRIPTION:Join this virtual conversation among a new SHRM-Atlanta network focused on total rewards!This month we'll discuss: Merit\, Performance\, and the Annual Review: Time to Move On or Double Down?The annual performance review is dead\, or isn't it? Many organizations are still doing some version of it and still tying merit increases to a process many managers dread and most employees distrust. So\, what's actually changed\, and what are organizations really do differently?The move away from traditional annual reviews was supposed to unlock more meaningful\, continuous feedback and fairer pay decisions. But without a structured process\, some organizations have found that merit increases become more subjective\, not less\, and that high performers aren't always the ones who benefit.Is pay for performance the right philosophy\, or does it create more problems than it solves? Can you have a credible merit increase process without formal performance reviews? And if you've moved away from the annual cycle\, what did you replace it with and is it actually working?This is a bring-your-honest-experience conversation.
X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:Join this virtual conversation among a new SHRM-Atlanta network focused on total rewards!
This month we'\;ll discuss: Merit\, Performance\, and the Annual Review: Time to Move On or Double Down?
The annual performance review is dead\, or isn&rsquo\;t it? Many organizations are still doing some version of it and still tying merit increases to a process many managers dread and most employees distrust. So\, what'\;s actually changed\, and what are organizations really do differently?
The move away from traditional annual reviews was supposed to unlock more meaningful\, continuous feedback and fairer pay decisions. But without a structured process\, some organizations have found that merit increases become more subjective\, not less\, and that high performers aren'\;t always the ones who benefit.
Is pay for performance the right philosophy\, or does it create more problems than it solves? Can you have a credible merit increase process without formal performance reviews? And if you'\;ve moved away from the annual cycle\, what did you replace it with and is it actually working?
This is a bring-your-honest-experience conversation.
LOCATION:
UID:e.4604.1485516
SEQUENCE:3
DTSTAMP:20260617T025235Z
URL:https://members.shrmatlanta.org/events/Details/total-rewards-network-meetup-1761261?sourceTypeId=Hub
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR